According to traditional American common law, this was an arbitrary or indefinite period to cover the life expectancy of a lessee or lessor and to ensure ownership of the owner. In addition, 99 years was considered an approximate period of three generations. I`m not sure you`re reading what I have. But I don`t see that this is a myth. Nowhere in andrestexan after the transformation in 1950 is it said that India is not a member of commonwealth rule. I see that Scripture says independent domination. This is a subject that is not clear, I think India is separate from the domination of the Commonwealth (with the exception of the agreement) and I think that India has a common legal system whose infrastructure still today has the influence of British colonial rule. This theme is not a proven myth, the 99-year lease is a definitive possibility and makes sense. .